From the Errancy Discussion list, 12-24-98:
Exodus 32:7-14
>BROTHER MICHAEL Perhaps I did not make myself sufficiently clear; only
in the rarest of instances is one justified in disobeying
God or one of His prophets. These three instances are, I
believe, the only such instances in the OT. Let's look
briefly at them. > >A. Exodus 32:7-14: Although Moses resisted God, and God
changed His mind, it is still possible that if Moses had
stepped aside and allowed God to destroy that disobedient
generation of Israelites, and start over again with just
Moses and his immediate family, things ultimately might
have turned out better all around, although there is no
way of knowing for sure. So I cannot say for certain that
Moses did the right thing in resisting God. After the same
manner, God gave Israel a king when they rejected Him as
being their only King, and wanted a king just like the
nations round about. > >DAVIS Hold it, Michael! I may not be as learned and erudite as
other posters, but I can tell when something's rotten. Why
am I expected to believe that an omniscient, prescient, and
omnipotent being like YHWH can be argued out of His intention
by a former shepherd? Admittedly, YHWH was a bit out of sorts
that day, acting like a child throwing a temper tantrum, but
still, to lose an argument with a mere human? What kind of
god are you selling here? This is a god who changes his mind?
To use biblical language a god who can "repent"? TILL The incident that Michael referred to here is just one of many
that could be cited to show the absurdity of believing that the
Bible is the inspired work of an omniscient, omnipotent deity.
I cited this example in my series of postings about a year ago
that were intended to show the logistic impossibilities in some
of the wilderness-wandering stories. Few inerrantist attempts
were made to resolve the many problems that I identified in those
postings. If Fitzpatrick keeps spamming us with cut-and-paste
jobs, I'm going to forward those postings to him and ask him
to resolve the problems identified in them. Farrell Till
No comments:
Post a Comment