From The Skeptical Review, 1995:
by Farrell Till
by Farrell Till
When I was an active Christian minister and missionary, I noticed that
women were generally more zealous church workers than men. As I learned
more and more about the Bible, I began to wonder why. In my younger
days,
I had often heard preachers cite the elevated status of women as one of
the wonderful achievements of the Judeo-Christian religions, but this
was not what I was seeing in my own private Bible studies. I was
finding
instead a shockingly disdainful attitude toward women in a book that
had
been presumably written by divinely inspired men.
Time would fail me if I tried to cite every biblical example of
contemptuous attitudes toward women, so I will have to limit myself to
just a few. King David's affair with Bathsheba while her husband Uriah
was
away on military duty produced an embarrassing pregnancy. David first
tried to conceal his indiscretion by bringing Uriah home on furlough
apparently so that he would sleep with Bathsheba and later think that
the
child was his. When Uriah's loyalty to his unit proved so strong that
he
refused to indulge in the pleasures of a conjugal visit, David sent him
back to the front with a letter ordering the commander of his unit to
put
Uriah in "the forefront of the hottest battle" and then withdraw so
that
he would be killed. The order was executed, and when word of Uriah's
death reached David, he took Bathsheba and added her to his harem ( 2 Samuel 11).
If there is such a thing as contemptuous conduct, then David's
actions in
this matter certainly qualify. One would think that if this deed called
for divine wrath, David would have been the rightful target of it. But
the Bible tells us that God chose to punish David only by inflicting
pain
and death on the members of his family, beginning with his wives.
Nathan
the prophet, sent to reprimand David for his sin, delivered this
message
from God: "I will take thy wives before thine eyes, and give them unto
thy
neighbor, and he will lie with thy wives in the sight of this sun" (2 Samuel 12:11). One could imagine that this would not have been a
pleasant thing for David to witness and would have in that sense
constituted "punishment," but we must look past that to the fact of
what
God was threatening to do. David had sinned grievously, but God was
going
to punish him by having some unnamed "neighbor" rape his wives "before
all
Israel and before the sun" (v 12).
According to the story, David repented and so his wives were
spared the indignity of public rape, but that is beside the point. The
fact that David's god would even threaten such a thing raises serious
doubts about the Bible's claim to be the verbally inspired word of an
omnibeneficent deity. Certainly, this story in no way reflects the
"elevated status" that preachers say the Bible has brought to women. If
it does, I have to admit that I can't see it.